
Solving the Data Puzzle:
A How to Guide
on Collecting and Sharing Information to
Improve Educational Outcomes for
Children in
Out-of-Home Care
Excerpt from page 13:
CASE EXAMPLE : DATA MATCHING
The Los Angeles Education Coordinating Council (ECC) provides an
example of the effectiveness of data matching. Beginning with the
collaboration
of seven school districts, the council achieved a preliminary data
match for 8,000 children served by the child welfare system and the
LA
Unified School District. Data was correlated based on names, addresses,
genders, and dates of birth of children and youth. The data reviewed
included: grade level, attendance rates, standardized test scores,
state high school exit exam scores, special education services, participation
in gifted/talented programs suspensions, and ELL participation. The
data match revealed that youth in the child welfare system demonstrated
a
pattern of below grade-level school performance and high rates of
special education enrollment compared with other children. In a county
with
an average high school graduation rate of 79%, only 57% of children
in the region’s child welfare system graduated.
Excerpt from page 13:
CASE EXAMPLE : LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
As a result of the data collection efforts undertaken by the Los
Angeles Education Coordinating Council (ECC) numerous innovations
are now
yielding dramatic results. Created in 2004, ECC established a 25-person
Los Angeles county-wide leadership council which includes a presiding
judge, seven school district superintendents (representing 81 school
districts within Los Angeles County) as well probation officers,
foster parents and the director of child welfare. All school districts
are mandated to participate in ECC pursuant to a court order issued
by the
presiding judge of Juvenile Court of Los Angeles.
As one example of the positive results ECC has had, under a pilot
program introduced in a growing number of school districts, students
adjudicated dependent and/or delinquent participate in the development
of an “Education Plan” with input from a multidisciplinary team.
The individualized plan (similar to an IEP in concept) encompasses
three elements: an assessment of credits and grades; identification
of education goals and objectives; and the creation of a realistic
transition plan.
The Los Angeles Unified School District also created a “Foster
Care Unit” within the district to provide targeted services, such
as tutoring and
enrichment programs, to over 8,900 children in care. It also developed
an “Academic Mentoring Program” for dependent and delinquent
youth; and outsourced county children and youth administrators
and caseworkers to work at schools.
School districts have also started to maintain their own databases
to track children in their schools adjudicated dependent and/or
delinquent. These interventions are working. According to the most
recent data, the number of youth adjudicated dependent scoring
proficient or advanced on standardized tests has increased by 9.4%
in English and 7.5% in Math. Disciplinary rates are also down –
decreasing from 16.8%
to13.1% for dependent youth and dropping from 77.8% to 48.9% for
probationary youth.
Go
Back to the Previous Page
|